Casually-Exclusive: The New (and Best) Way to Date!

By  |  15 Comments

Your man having trouble committing? Give him something that’s easy to commit to.

Really…does he have to love you that often?

It’s the age-old problem every happy bachelor faces: He likes a girl, just not enough to spend all of his days and nights with her.

Cue the suffocation!

We’ve all been there: What starts off as a few good dates, some interesting phone calls, and even a couple of flirtatious texts, almost always dissolves into that awkward “Where is this going?” conversation.

And just when you think, “Here’s a girl who’s fun to hang out with,” along comes the Debbie Downer of romance, giving you, either directly or indirectly, the dreaded ultimatum: Either get serious or get off the love train.

Which is fine, if “getting serious” didn’t mean “being in contact 24/7.”

This is probably how the “He can’t commit” stigma was born; not because the guy wasn’t interested in her, but because he couldn’t give her as much time and attention as she wanted—and he freaked.

All By Myself

As you may recall, my longest relationship to date is seven weeks (the BachelorUNCUT equivalent to three years!). And looking back on that ill-fated romance, it’s clear when things started to go sour: right around the time I felt the need to text her for no reason (i.e. maintaining some sort of contact), so she wouldn’t think something was wrong.

Why? Because she was looking for something MORE…or at least a sign that all of this great chemistry and amazing first few dates we had had was headed towards something more substantial.

Yes ladies, if you think it’s “abnormal” that the guy you’re seeing hasn’t contacted you in 2-3 days, then I’m talking to YOU!

And this is where I’ve always struggled. Because there are days when I just have nothing to say (to anyone for that matter) or would like to spend a weekend watching Entourage re-runs–ALONE.

Somewhere along the way, however, relationships started to get lumped into one of two categories: “Just seeing each other casually” and “We now do everything together.

Some of the women are rolling their eyes right now, but imagine if their boyfriend told them, “I think I’d like to be alone this weekend,” or, worse yet, didn’t call or text for a full day. Chances are, they’d start to push the panic button.

But what if there was an arrangement where you got the best of both worlds? Well, there is folks!

Drumroll…

It’s called “Casually-Exclusive,” otherwise known as “being in a relationship where you’re exclusive to one another, just not every second of every single day.”

Or, put another way, it’s like having a full-time romance, but on a PART-TIME schedule. 

Not to be confused with the Urban Dictionary’s definition of the term, where you keep your partner’s identity on the down-low, my version of Casually-Exclusive gives you the benefits of a serious, monogamous relationship without the excess “stuff” that can make things complicated (or, at the very least, less enjoyable).

Yes, people will say that no one wants to be alone, and that “when the right one comes along” you’ll want to spend as much time as you can with that person—without even realizing it.

But that’s bullshit!

BachelorUNCUT was born, in part, from the notion that some people, usually dudes, like their independence…the kind of independence that can only be enjoyed whilst unattached.

Why it pays to be Casually-Exclusive:

It’s Perfect for Commitment-Phobes!
Never feel suffocated again.

No More Forced Communications!
Forget the unnecessary texting; You only talk when you actually have something to say (a.k.a. minimizing the chances of getting on each other’s nerves). Should 2-3 days pass before you talk to each other, then so be it.

Enjoy Your Separate Lives
Being Casually-Exclusive means never intruding on each other’s personal space, and/or doing those activities that the other person is not so fond of. Why compromise if you don’t have to?

Get the Benefit of One (Constant) Sex Partner!
Avoid the legwork of having to bounce around from one one-night-stand to the next. Plus, you’ll have peace of mind knowing that you’re both being sexually-responsible.

Worth a Try…

It isn’t written in stone that a relationship has to be an “all or nothing” deal. Sometimes, going the unconventional route (i.e. putting some distance between the two of you) could very well be the key to longevity.

Some might say this is unrealistic, but if you ask me, going “casual” is about as fool-proof as you can get. If absence really does make the heart grow fonder, then think of everything you stand to gain: A lowered risk of cheating, fewer fights…need I go on?

Now, if I could just find someone to get “casual” with and put this theory to the test!

What do you think of the “Casually-Exclusive” theory…doable or dumb?
Share your comments below.

  • Lilsmoky

    As this is perfect ideal relationship, eventually it fails. Someone always ends up falling in love. Just saying :) it was fun while it lasted.

  • Yanks4Life

    I agree with you that this is perfect on paper. But no girl would sign up for this, or put up with this arrangement for long :(

  • Player1979

    Sign me up!

  • Jessica_Scharr

    Some valid points for sure, but not sure bout going 4-5 days without any communication. You sure that’s a relationship? Casual friendship maybe.

  • RNYC

    “We’re casually-exclusive.” Does have a nice ring to it lol

  • Havanna Rose

    Two-three days without contact? If you’re just a “friend”, I can do two, three, four days without contact but if you’re my boyfriend, hell no! What’s the point of being in a relationship? What’s so perfect about this ridiculous arrangement? How do you come to the conclusion that there would be a lower risk of cheating? And what’s love got to do with it? What you’re talking about sounds more like “Casually-Convenient” and I could take it a step further and call it “Exclusively-Convenient” which is definitely not my cup of tea and maybe that’s why I don’t like nor drink tea. The only thing I do agree with is that you don’t have to be together 24/7. However, what I have to have if I am to be in a relationship is SEX, at the very minimum, every single day and on weekends, at least twice a day. Any guy who prefers to stay home and watch Entourage re-runs ALONE rather than be with me is definitely not someone I would be interested in dating.

    • http://bacheloruncut.com/ Bachelor Uncut

      Now that you’ve had some time to simmer down, I’m hoping you’ve had a change of heart ;) Perhaps we can discuss this over some “casual tea.” It’s a winning formula, you’ll see!

  • Lightning Linda

    I dont think going 2 or 3 days is right unless you have another boyfriend on the side :) texting or talking 24 hours a day is too much and not a healthy relationship but I feel once or twice a day is okay just to see how your main squeeze is its called being human..Remember if anything would happen to your partner and you go the 2 or 3 day rule how would one feel :(…So on this article I disagree with the bachelor :)

  • Gee Kalo

    Naturally…I would be one to love this… LOVE it… perfect balance…no drama…
    Thank YOU Bachelor.

    • http://bacheloruncut.com/ Bachelor Uncut

      You’re welcome, as usual ;) Have you been casually-exclusive lately?

  • Laissez Faire

    So, a guy who wants this “casually-exclusive” arrangement is content to have sex only 2 times a week tops, right? (seriously, what is he, 80 years old?) And he doesn’t wanna know much about my everyday life or anything else about me for that matter. Well, sounds like a fuck buddy with exclusive rights. Sorry, but no. Why would I give exclusive rights to a fuck buddy? Not very fulfilling, is he?

  • Jessie

    I was essentially in this kind of relationship for the last two months. We started out texting one another everyday(with him usually being the instigator), then that dropped to emails(he got a cheaper phone plan) outlaying plans for our weekend dates(the only time we see one another). It seemed to be working and I was fine with the arrangement as a new relationship. But then the lack of communication and the weekend visits apparently were also suffocating(for him) and he said he liked his free time too much, so he didn’t see this evolving beyond what we had, but of course I could still see him every weekend and we could do things(thus essentially not changing anything in regards to the arrangement). In practice, it seemed to be a good thing but even my lack of interference in his life was too much interference for him. But hey, I still have a fuck buddy right? The sex is going to be great now that I’ve been relegated to even less than I was.

  • Guest

    I’ve been in a casually exclusive relationship for 6 months ad counting :) works fantastic! Takes the pressure off and Honestly we go days without texting and it doesn’t phase either of us. No break up in sight.

  • MicheeD

    We’ve been seeing each other over a month, he says he wants to keep things casual, but exclusive and to take the exclusive lightly…what the heck does that mean?! Confused…

  • J

    Dear Bachelor uncut,

    My newish girl (casual dating for 5 months) and I hsve been having this discussion. She wants to have a casual exclusive relationship, no expectations or obligations, see each other maybe once every week or 2. There is mad chemistry between us but because she has never had a boyfriend, she really has no clue about her feelings and has a clear fesr about venturing further with a guy into anything that could remotely tamper with her independance. She is 11 years younger than me if that helps. One of my thoughts is she is a girl that I’ve been waiting for in all other areas, but her relationship maturity and experience is showing weakness here. Seeing anyone exclusively on a maybe once every 1-2 weeks does not show me any value of being exclusive. Decemeber and maybe twice for the month? Someone care to explain where my benefit is to being her exclusive casual partner once or twice a month?

    I will be following for answers.